Communio Viatorum

Aims & Scope

Communio viatorum is a peer-reviewed journal that follows all ethical guidelines necessary for publishing high-quality original articles in the field of theology. Communication between authors, editors, reviewers, and the editorial board is transparent, professional, and conducted in accordance with theCOPECode of Conduct. The texts published in the journal must be relevant to the journal’s area of expertise and undergo a double-blind peer review process. Authors warrant that the text offered to Communio viatorum is their original work and has not been previously published or submitted elsewhere. They must properly acknowledge any ideas or formulations that are not their own. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously is unethical. Similarly, plagiarism and deliberate misrepresentation of facts are unacceptable. Authors are responsible for both content and form of their claims proposed in submitted texts. If the language of the text is not the authors’ mother tongue, they may be asked to have it proofread by a native speaker. The editors evaluate submitted texts for their suitability to the journal’s subject matter, scope, and level of preparation. If deemed appropriate, the text is sent for a double-blind peer review process, where an anonymized version is assessed by two independent experts. If the text is, from the outset, not suitable for the journal’s subject matter or scope, or if its scholarly level is clearly low, the editors inform the author promptly, explaining the reasons for non-acceptance. Upon receipt of the reviews, the editors will inform the authors of the outcome and send any requests for revisions to the text. Authors’ revising the text according to the reviewers’ recommendations is a prerequisite for further editorial activity. In case of inconclusive reviews, the editors will commission an additional review. The responsibility for selecting which texts are published lies solely with the editors. Their decisions are based

A twelfth criterion — whether APC fees are clearly disclosed — is not scored here; it is left out of the total rather than counted as a failure. Publication charges appear in the metrics card above.

Based on the Think.Check.Submit framework by DOAJ, COPE & OASPA. All data from verified open sources.

Source: OpenAlex · Each year’s green bar = citations earned by that year’s papers, counted to date — so recent years look lower simply because their papers haven’t had time to be cited yet.

SJR Quartile by Discipline

Scimago ranks this journal separately in each subject category — its quartile can differ by discipline.

Subject Classification