Caderno de Geografia
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais · Brazil · Est. 1990
Aims & Scope
Caderno de Geografia is a signatory of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) which intends to halt the practice of correlating the journal impact factor to the merits of a specific scientist's contributions. Also according to this statement, this practice creates biases and inaccuracies when appraising scientific research. It also states that the impact factor is not to be used as a substitute "measure of the quality of individual research articles, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions".
General Information
Submission Info
Ethics & Quality
Think.Check.Submit Compliance
Based on the Think.Check.Submit framework by DOAJ, COPE & OASPA. All data from verified open sources.
Publication & Citation Trend
Source: OpenAlex · Each year’s green bar = citations earned by that year’s papers, counted to date — so recent years look lower simply because their papers haven’t had time to be cited yet.
Subject Classification
Research Topics (OpenAlex)
Frequently asked questions about Caderno de Geografia
Is Caderno de Geografia a predatory journal?
PubScope has no integrity flags on record for Caderno de Geografia: it is indexed in DOAJ, and is not on DOAJ's withdrawn list. Its PubScope Trust Score is 52/100. Indexing is a transparency signal, not a guarantee — always confirm fit and policies before submitting.
What is the impact factor of Caderno de Geografia?
Caderno de Geografia is not in the Web of Science Core Collection, so it has no official Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Is Caderno de Geografia indexed in Scopus and Web of Science?
Caderno de Geografia is indexed in DOAJ.
What is the aims and scope of Caderno de Geografia?
Caderno de Geografia is a signatory of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) which intends to halt the practice of correlating the journal impact factor to the merits of a specific scientist's contributions. Also according to this statement, this practice creates biases and inaccuracies when appraising scientific research. It also states that the impact factor is not to be used as a substitute "measure of the quality of individual research articles, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions".
You May Also Like
See all →Data updated: 2026-05-26 · Sources: SJR, DOAJ, OpenAlex, WoS, Crossref