Applied Medical Informatics

Aims & Scope

About the Journal Focus and Scope Applied Medical Informatics ( Appl Med Inform ) publishes original research , reviews , editorial s, perspectives , research letters , editorials , commentaries , technology platforms , case study , communications , and point of views in the fields of medical informatics, decision support systems and application of ICT in healthcare as well as in the area of methodology for medical research and clinical studies, dealing with medical data processing, medical signal and image processing, statistics applied in healthcare and medicine, information systems in health care, processing and expert systems, simulation and modeling. Peer Review Process Being of utter importance for filtering high-quality research and for maintaining journal focus, peer review is systematically used for all papers sent to our journal. All papers submitted to the journal are subjected to single-blind (only reviewers are anonymous), unbiased, independent critical evaluation. The review process is as follows: First, according to its scope, the executive editor checks the article for its suitability to be published in the journal. Furthermore, the articles are checked for plagiarism in this step with Sistemantiplagiat.ro . Next, the editor assigns the article to two independent reviewers to critically appraise the paper. The reviewers are selected based on their field of expertise to match the article's content from the journal database of reviewers, or e-mail to become reviewers are sent to experts in the field of the article. The reviewers are asked to evaluate the article if they do not have any competing interests. If they consider they do not have enough expertise on the article content or decline the review, another reviewer is asked to help with the review. Subsequently, the reviewers assess the article, write their comments to the author and the editor, and give their recommendations. At the end of the reviewing round, the editor decides: accept the submiss

A twelfth criterion — whether APC fees are clearly disclosed — is not scored here; it is left out of the total rather than counted as a failure. Publication charges appear in the metrics card above.

Based on the Think.Check.Submit framework by DOAJ, COPE & OASPA. All data from verified open sources.

Source: OpenAlex · Each year’s green bar = citations earned by that year’s papers, counted to date — so recent years look lower simply because their papers haven’t had time to be cited yet.

Subject Classification