Homeβ€ΊSearchβ€ΊAsian Review of Public Administration

Asian Review of Public Administration

Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration (EROPA) and Asian Association for Public Administration (AAPA) Β· Philippines Β· Est. 2025

ISSN2094-408X
βœ“ DOAJβœ“ Open Access
52
/ 100
Established
PubScope credibility score from verifiable indexing & ethics signals
Score Breakdown
β—† DOAJ-listed52
Total52
Third-party records Β· how this is calculated Β· Report an error β†’
H-Indexi
1
Total Worksi
37
Total Citationsi
1
2yr Mean Citednessi
0.03
Open Impact Factor alternative

Aims & Scope

AimThe Administrative Review: Public Administration and Policy (ARPA) is the flagship double-blind peer-reviewed journal of the Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration (EROPA) and the Association of Administrative Professions of Asia (AAPA). ARPA aims to be the definitive scholarly platform for examining public administration and policy within the unique socio-political, economic, and cultural contexts of the Asia-Pacific region and the Global South.We prioritize publishing comparative and contextually nuanced research that addresses the specific governance challenges of developing, transitional, and emerging economies. Our mission is to bridge the gap between theoretical scholarship and practical application, providing evidence-based insights that inform policy reform and capacity building for effective, equitable, and resilient governance. ScopeARPA's scope is intentionally focused on the dynamics of public administration and policy as practiced in Asia-Pacific and Global South nations. We welcome robust empirical studies, theoretical advancements, and systematic case studies that employ qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods approaches. A core emphasis is placed on research that offers comparative analysis, draws practical lessons, and contributes to policy learning across member states of EROPA and AAPA. Administrative Traditions and Reform in Asian BureaucraciesDescription: This area examines the evolution and reform of public bureaucracies shaped by distinct historical, cultural, and political contextsβ€”from Confucian and post-colonial systems to Pacific Island governance models. We seek research that moves beyond importing Western New Public Management templates, instead focusing on how traditional values (e.g., patronage, collectivism, meritocracy) interact with modern reform agendas like performance management, digitalization, and open government. Studies should offer critical insights into building effective, accountable, and contextual

General Information

Country / RegionPhilippines
Primary LanguageEnglish
1st Year Published2025
Annual Volume~ 31 articles / year
StatusActive (last: 2026)
Total Publications37
OA Since2023
Visit Journal Website

Submission Info

Peer ReviewDouble anonymous peer review
Review Timeβ€”
Acceptance Rateβ€”
OA LicenseCC BY-NC
OA Rateβ€”

Ethics & Quality

COPE Memberβœ— No
OASPA Memberβœ— No
Not on Predatory Listsβœ“ Yes

Think.Check.Submit Compliance

8/12 Β· 67%
βœ…
Do you know the journal / publisher?
Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration (EROPA) and Asian Association for Public Administration (AAPA)
βœ…
Does the journal have a website?
βœ“ Linked
βœ…
Is the ISSN verified?
2094-408X
βœ…
Indexed in a trusted database?
DOAJ
βœ…
Peer review process documented?
Double anonymous peer review
❌
Follows ethical publishing standards (COPE)?
N/A
❌
APC fees clearly disclosed?
N/A
βœ…
Not on predatory/blacklists?
βœ“ Clean
❌
Long-term digital preservation?
N/A
❌
Plagiarism detection in place?
N/A
βœ…
Listed in DOAJ (verified OA)?
DOAJ verified
βœ…
Primary language documented?
English

Based on the Think.Check.Submit framework by DOAJ, COPE & OASPA. All data from verified open sources.

Subject Classification

Research Topics (OpenAlex)

E-Government and Public ServicesLocal Government Finance and DecentralizationPublic Policy and Administration ResearchFiscal Policies and Political EconomyMicrofinance and Financial InclusionCorruption and Economic DevelopmentSocial Capital and NetworksSmart Cities and TechnologiesCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsEducational Leadership and Innovation

Frequently asked questions about Asian Review of Public Administration

Is Asian Review of Public Administration a predatory journal?

PubScope has no integrity flags on record for Asian Review of Public Administration: it is indexed in DOAJ, and is not on DOAJ's withdrawn list. Its PubScope Trust Score is 52/100. Indexing is a transparency signal, not a guarantee β€” always confirm fit and policies before submitting.

What is the impact factor of Asian Review of Public Administration?

Asian Review of Public Administration is not in the Web of Science Core Collection, so it has no official Clarivate Journal Impact Factor. Its open 2-year mean citedness is 0.03.

Is Asian Review of Public Administration indexed in Scopus and Web of Science?

Asian Review of Public Administration is indexed in DOAJ.

What is the aims and scope of Asian Review of Public Administration?

AimThe Administrative Review: Public Administration and Policy (ARPA) is the flagship double-blind peer-reviewed journal of the Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration (EROPA) and the Association of Administrative Professions of Asia (AAPA). ARPA aims to be the definitive scholarly platform for examining public administration and policy within the unique socio-political, economic, and cultural contexts of the Asia-Pacific region and the Global South.We prioritize publishing comparative and contextually nuanced research that addresses the specific governance challenges of develo

Compare This JournalFind Similar← Back to Search
Understand these signals
How to tell if a journal is predatoryWhat Q1–Q4 quartiles meanWeb of Science vs Scopus vs DOAJWhat is an APC?

Data updated: 2026-05-26 Β· Sources: SJR, DOAJ, OpenAlex, WoS, Crossref