Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi

Aims & Scope

JTES is a scientific, peer-reviewed, and open-access electronic journal. We welcome both theoretical and practical research, as well as reviews, on education. JTES does not charge any fee for anything. JTES aims to play a pivotal role in establishing an educational system that enables individuals to acquire the knowledge, skills, and competencies of the 21st century. JTES aims to contribute to the global discussion of educational policies and their reorganization by collecting studies on all stages of education, ranging from elementary to higher education, on an international platform. JTES aims to establish a common ground where scholars and teachers can follow research trends and foster their academic development. JTES accepts the following submissions: Studies analyzing the current situation, problems, and positive sides in all steps of education, ranging from elementary education to higher education, Studies analyzing the subjects related to all stakeholders (learner, teacher, academic, publisher, curriculum designer, and so on) in the education system, Studies analyzing the academic social, cultural and emotional developments of all stakeholders in education system, Studies touching upon the educational problems in Turkey and other countries or the studies that contain comparative studies in different countries, Studies suggesting theoretical and/or practical models for educational problems. However, JTES will analyze the quality of articles at the very first step of the submission. Accordingly, the below studies will not be accepted for the review process: - Studies that offer a descriptive review of literature, - Descriptive studies based on opinions of stakeholders, - Basic metaphor studies, - Descriptive quantitative studies using a single instrument and reporting differences in terms of some variables, - Correlational studies on a field that has been researched to a great extent, - Studies that are not directly related to educational sciences, - Qualitative studies that depend too much on the positivist paradigm, i.e., quantifying the findings without exerting a thorough qualitative analysis - Studies that are too local, that do not depend on international literature (%70 expected to be the literature in WoS or Scopus), and that are not related to international readers. - Studies of the authors with a line of publication records in predatory journals.

Based on the Think.Check.Submit framework by DOAJ, COPE & OASPA. All data from verified open sources.

Subject Classification