Language Policy in Africa
Bern Open Publishing · Switzerland
Aims & Scope
Submissions that are directly or indirectly related to language policies in Africa are considered in-scope, insofar as they address the position of African languages (either past, present or future). Submissions of a purely linguistic nature (e.g. descriptions of language use in particular situations) are likely to be considered out-of-scope. Authors are requested to include a description of how their submissions add to existing knowledge, either in the abstract, the introduction or the conclusion of the text. As an example: reports of surveys on language attitudes among groups of students are not likely to be accepted, unless they contribute a new angle not already reported in the literature.
General Information
Submission Info
Ethics & Quality
Think.Check.Submit Compliance
Based on the Think.Check.Submit framework by DOAJ, COPE & OASPA. All data from verified open sources.
Subject Classification
Research Topics (OpenAlex)
Frequently asked questions about Language Policy in Africa
Is Language Policy in Africa a predatory journal?
PubScope has no integrity flags on record for Language Policy in Africa: it is indexed in DOAJ, and is not on DOAJ's withdrawn list. Its PubScope Trust Score is 52/100. Indexing is a transparency signal, not a guarantee — always confirm fit and policies before submitting.
What is the impact factor of Language Policy in Africa?
Language Policy in Africa is not in the Web of Science Core Collection, so it has no official Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.
Is Language Policy in Africa indexed in Scopus and Web of Science?
Language Policy in Africa is indexed in DOAJ.
What is the aims and scope of Language Policy in Africa?
Submissions that are directly or indirectly related to language policies in Africa are considered in-scope, insofar as they address the position of African languages (either past, present or future). Submissions of a purely linguistic nature (e.g. descriptions of language use in particular situations) are likely to be considered out-of-scope. Authors are requested to include a description of how their submissions add to existing knowledge, either in the abstract, the introduction or the conclusion of the text. As an example: reports of surveys on language attitudes among groups of students are
You May Also Like
See all →Data updated: 2026-05-26 · Sources: SJR, DOAJ, OpenAlex, WoS, Crossref