Journal of the European Honors Council

Aims & Scope

Effective:October 15, 2025Audience:Authors, editors, reviewersContact:[email protected] 1) What is alloweda) Use AI for grammar, spelling, and readabilityafterdrafting. Authors must review and consider all edits. 2) What is not allowedb) Listing an AI system as an author.c) Relying on AI to create substantive scholarly content (e.g., findings, conclusions, literature reviews) without disclosure and human verification.d) Entering confidential, proprietary, or personal data into public AI tools. 3) What is allowed (with disclosure)e) Use AI within the research methods (e.g., coding assistance, qualitative coding support, analysis) when fully documented.f) Use AI-generated media only for illustration or when AI is the object of study. Such media must be clearly labeled as AI-generated and must not be presented as empirical evidence. -AI used in methods: “We used [Tool, Version] for [task]. Prompts, parameters, code, and representative outputs are provided in Supplement X. Results were independently verified.” JEHC will review this policy annually or sooner as legal, technical, and scholarly norms evolve. Community feedback (authors, reviewers, and readers) is welcome at [email protected]

A twelfth criterion — whether APC fees are clearly disclosed — is not scored here; it is left out of the total rather than counted as a failure. Publication charges appear in the metrics card above.

Based on the Think.Check.Submit framework by DOAJ, COPE & OASPA. All data from verified open sources.

Source: OpenAlex · Each year’s green bar = citations earned by that year’s papers, counted to date — so recent years look lower simply because their papers haven’t had time to be cited yet.

Subject Classification